Notes
from the programme
A young man
walks into a classroom of the Department of Engineering at the University
of Montreal and kills 14 female students. Why? Another young man walks
into a restaurant in South Carolina and starts spraying the customers
with automatic rifle fire. Why? This list could be considerably lengthened.
What leads people to do such things? In every case it is said the perpetrator
was demented, mad or psychologically disturbed in some way. It is explained
away somehow as a result of childhood trauma, mother complex, father
complex, manic depression, social deprivation etc. These explanations
are all partial and based ultimately on the neo-Darwinian dogma which
pervades all our fundamental attitudes. This can be made, through elaborate
contortions, to allow for the divine in nature and man, but the diabolic
is another.
Today
we have an unbounded respect for madness of one kind or another, but
what if the relation between psychosis, madness and evil is the other
way round, i.e. it is not that evil is a result of some psychotic disorder,
but that psychotic disorders and much more besides are the result of
Evil? This is not to say that psychic “disorders” are invariably
evil in origin, but in all these phenomena we are confronted by something
that lies beyond the threshold of normal consciousness, and whatever
it is we find there is not necessarily friendly.
One
could say, therefore, that those who commit such crimes are in the grip
of some threshold experience of a most “unfriendly” nature,
the old, direct word for this being “evil”. They have opened
themselves in some way to the prompting of evil and have thus become
its instrument. Now although this view runs counter to most modern thinking,
which seeks to reduce evil to psychology or behaviour or environment,
it is nevertheless the way the situation is presented in Shakespeare’s
MACBETH. In this play we are treated to the spectacle of a woman inviting
evil into herself:
“Come you spirits that tend on mortal thoughts,
Unsex me here...”
She
consciously unites herself with the all-pervasive atmosphere of evil
which Shakespeare establishes from the play’s first line. The
Shakespearian scholar G. Wilson Knight shows, in his essay* on MACBETH,
how Shakespeare builds up this total fabric of evil in the play in away
that makes it impossible to regard the “black agents”, who
are the prime movers in its action, as mere symbols of Lady Macbeth’s
psychological make-up. If symbols they are, then they are living symbols,
with a life of their own.
Caught
also in this immanent evil is Lady Macbeth’s husband. Macbeth
is a man driven by tribal and filial allegiance, capable, as we hear
early on, of a noble battle-rage worthy of the ancient Celtic heroes,
but this manliness of will is not matched in him by a corresponding
manliness of thought. The difficulty he has in shaping his thoughts
is something he regularly complains about:
“My thought....
Shakes so my single state of man, that function
Is smothered in surmise and nothing is
But what is not.”
Like
Lear, he knows his own mind “but slenderly”. What sways
his thoughts most clearly is the ambition rising from his will. This
is seized upon by his wife, whose imagination has been spirited into
as clear and sharp a focus as Macbeth’s is dull and befuddled.
Taking hold of this ambitious aspiration, while taunting his unquestionably
“single state of man”, Lady Macbeth is able to parasitise
her husbands will, displacing his weak thinking with the ruthless guile
of her own depraved kind.
Shakespeare,
as dramatist, is not content merely to suggest this, but either names
or portrays the beings by which this possession is accomplished. In
addition to “Weird Sisters” there are evil powers “...that
tend on mortal thoughts”. They are the diabolic potential which
we tend to fight shy of naming or acknowledging. They are indeed part
of “the unconscious”, but are activated by our conscious
activity, as Shakespeare’s phrase most eloquently expresses.
The
quality of the latter will determine the scope of the formers power
over us. In the play it is the unholy alliance between the feminine
imagination and the masculine will that grants this evil potential the
space to work. By using a carefully chosen sequence of scenes from MACBETH
we have sought to show this process of the incarnation of evil in action.
Shakespeare’s ageless genius helps us become aware of the Macbeth
and Lady Macbeth in each of us, and if we can gain such self-knowledge
we are half-way to overcoming them.
Norman Skillen
* “Macbeth”
and the metaphysic of evil.